Judge NIKOLAYEV Sergei Vyacheslavovich (НИКОЛАЕВ СЕРГЕЙ ВЯЧЕСЛАВОВИЧ)
Picture of Nicolas

Nicolas

BY 2020.08.28 Another Surprise was Received, this time from Deputy Chairman S.V. Nikolayev of Minsk City Court.

On the 28th of July, 2020, Attorney Ms. Martha Poni wrote a  final letter to A.A. Zabara, deputy chairman of the Supreme Court of Belarus, presenting and describing the atrocities, vandalism, and perversion of the law I was facing in my litigation process in Belarus. This was an EPILOGUE from Ms. Martha Poni, who didn’t expect any answers from anyone from BELARUS! 

Presentation of Officials and Protagonists

On the 12th of August, Ms. Poni received an irrelevant answer from Chairman Makarevich Svetlana Yuryevna, who informed Ms. Poni about the routines on how to submit an APPEAL!! Obviously, Judge Makarevich must have misunderstood the purpose of the letter to A.A. Zabara, or Ms. Martha Poni provoked something else to the Chairman of the Oktyabrsky District Court……..

MAKAREVICH Svetlana Yurievna (Макаревич Светлана Юрьевна)

Judge Svetlana Yurievna Makarevich – Chairman of the Oktyabrsky District Court in Minsk, Belarus

On the 28th of August, Attorney Ms. Martha Poni received another irrelevant letter, this time from Minsk City Court and Deputy Chairman S.V. Nikolayev. This was beyond all our expectations.

Judge NIKOLAYEV Sergei Vyacheslavovich (НИКОЛАЕВ СЕРГЕЙ ВЯЧЕСЛАВОВИЧ)

Judge NIKOLAEV SERGEY VYACHESLAVOVICH (НИКОЛАЕВ СЕРГЕЙ ВЯЧЕСЛАВОВИЧ)
Deputy Charman Minsk City Court

The Complete Answer:

The inspection established that the arguments of your appeal were the subject of an investigation by the Oktyabrsky District Court of the City of Minsk. Based on the results of the consideration, you were provided with a response dated August 12, 2020, with appropriate explanations. Your appeal received on July 28, 2020, to the court’s e-mail address, has been considered by the Minsk City Court within its competence.

There are no grounds for additional inspection. (!?)

We believe it necessary to draw your attention to the fact that in accordance with the requirements of Law of the Republic of Belarus No. 300-З dated July 18, 2011, “On Appeals of Citizens and Legal Entities” (hereinafter referred to as the Law), citizens exercise the right to appeal personally or through their representatives. (!?)

The representatives of the appellants exercise their powers on the basis of legislative acts, or acts of authorized state bodies, or a power of attorney drawn up in the manner prescribed by civil law.

The execution of a power of attorney, its validity period, and the procedure for termination are governed by Articles 186-190 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Belarus.

Documents confirming the authority of the representative must be attached to the written appeal submitted by it.

If other persons interested in the outcome of the case believe that their rights and legitimate interests have been violated by the actions of the Oktyabrsky District Court of the City of Minsk, they have the right to appeal to the district court or higher courts personally or through their representatives in compliance with the requirements of the Law.

In case of disagreement with the response to the appeal, you have the right to appeal it to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus.

Deputy Chairman            S.V. Nikolayev

Attached Hereto:

2020.08.28 RU ANSWER from Deputy Chairman Nikolayev Minsk City Court on Martha P. final Letter to the Supr. Court A.A. Zabara

2020.08.28 EN ANSWER from Deputy Chairman Nikolayev Minsk City Court on Martha P. final Letter to the Supr. Court A.A. Zabara

Nicolaos AA Cheropoulos
Father of Anthoula and Alexandra
Stockholm, Aug 2020
Reviewed Oct. 2023
en_USEN